Home  > Collaboration > Discussion Forum > Active Discussions

Welcome to the COE Discussion Forum! 

 

To participate in the discussion forum, you must be logged in to the website.  If you forget your login information, please contact COE Headquarters at coe@coe.org or (800) 263-2255.

If you are new to the COE Discussion Forum and would like to participate, please register.
Register Today
COE 2009 Annual PLM Conference & TechniFair

COE DISCUSSION FORUM
Forums > COE Forums > CATIA V5
Subject: -

You are not authorized to post a reply.   
Author Messages
COE-FORUM-USER

17 Jan 2002 11:38 AM
Hi All

I have this problem that I think might be a bug but would like a second opinion on. For the sake of argument assume I have a product containing several parts and a couple of sub-products and I apply numbering so that item numbers are used for the bill-of-material analysis. I can create a GA drawing of the assembly and balloon it up - no problem. When I come to open one of the sub-products and produce a sub assembly drawing I find that the item numbering has not propogated to the sub product (in fact the sub product has no numbering applied) so I can't balloon up the sub-assembly drawing consistently with the overall bill of material.

The question is - is my methodology for producing assemblies with sub-assemblies inconsistent with Dassaults' or is this a known problem which will be fixed? (I have V5R7SP3).


Thanks in advance
Peter

Author: Peter Lovelock
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Forums > COE Forums > CATIA V5 > -


ActiveForums 3.6

    

401 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611-4267 | (312) 321-5153 | (800) COE-CALL (U.S.)